On 24 June
2019, NASA is sending an atomic clock into space. Not just any old atomic
clock, either. It's up to 50 times more accurate than the atomic clocks aboard
GPS satellites, its precision only changing by one second every 10 million
years.
It's only
the size of a toaster, yet it could revolutionise deep-space travel.
It's called
the Deep Space Atomic Clock, and the next year will be crucial to its
development, with NASA monitoring its performance as it orbits Earth at an
altitude of 720 kilometres (447 miles) - nearly twice the distance from Earth
as the International Space Station. It'll be launched aboard SpaceX's Falcon
Heavy rocket.
Atomic
clocks are the lynchpin of satellite navigation. GPS satellites are constantly
sending light-speed radio signals transmitting the location and time they left
the satellite. The receiver on Earth - your mobile phone, for instance -
measures the time delay from each satellite, and converts this into spatial
coordinates.
This is
pretty much how spacecraft navigation works, too. Navigators here on Earth will
send a signal to the spacecraft, and the spacecraft sends one back. Because the
signal travels at a known speed, the time this takes allows the distance to the
spacecraft to be calculated.
As you can
probably imagine, the more accurate the clock, the better the location data.
This is where the atomic clock comes in.
Most clocks
and watches now are based on a quartz oscillator. Because quartz crystals
vibrate at a regular frequency when a small electric current is applied, they
can be used as the basis for keeping time. That's perfectly fine for our
day-to-day timekeeping purposes, but over time these quartz oscillators lose
accuracy.
After just
six weeks, they can be off by as much as a millisecond, or a thousandth of a
second. That may not sound like much, but if we were relying on it for space
navigation, that tiny split second could mean a distance error of 300
kilometres.
Atomic
clocks, on the other hand, are based on the oscillations of trapped excited
atoms, which tick back and forth. And they're incredibly precise. The most
accurate atomic clocks ever made wouldn't gain or lose a second for billions of
years.
These are
quite large objects, and would not be suitable for sending to space. The atomic
clocks on satellites use caesium and rubidium atoms, and while they're much
more accurate than a quartz oscillator, they still drift, and ground-based
corrections need to be made twice a day from refrigerator-sized atomic clocks
on Earth.
The Deep
Space Atomic Clock is based on electrically charged mercury atoms, fewer than
can be found in two cans of tuna, contained in an electromagnetic trap. When
excited, these charged atoms, or ions, oscillate, producing optical
"ticks".
Although
we've had atomic clocks since the 1950s, mercury ion atomic clocks have only
been developed in the last 20 years, but they're already showing promise for
finer precision.
The Deep
Space Atomic Clock is, NASA says, up to 50 times more accurate than the caesium
and rubidium oscillators currently in orbit. It's as stable as the ground-based
atomic clocks on which their navigation is calculated.
This means
that, rather than the two-way signal system currently in use, the Deep Space
Atomic Clock could be used to perform tracking calculations right there
on-board the spacecraft, after receipt of a signal from Earth.
Comments
Post a Comment